I'm reading the book "The Two Income Trap" and am only about half-way thru it. I found myself crying after the first few pages though, so it's not for the faint-hearted. The good thing about it is that it's reinforcing a theory that I had (which of course I didn't have the data to support) but one that I couldn't help but observe. Basically, my theory was that for all the good that the women's movement had done for the liberation of women, it was in essence, a mixed blessing. Now that women have entered the workforce and can make a decent living, it has forced the cost of living to surge, hence created a society where families cannot succeed WITHOUT the mother working. What I couldn't explain was the direct connection between the women working and this increase in cost of living. This book filled in the blanks. I don't want to give it all away, but one of the main arguments the book makes is that families are so concerned about schools, that they will mortgage themselves to the tilt. In order to make sure they get that house in the right school district, the mother must work so that they have more income. This creates an over-inflated housing market where families are spending more on housing than any of their previous generations (see the book for actual figures). This is a dangerous situation for families to be in because there's no savings to act as a safety net in hard times. The rate of bankruptcies quoted in the book are astounding! There's lots of lessons to be learned from the study that the authors conducted, and it was somewhat refreshing when I saw one of the authors interviewed on "Now with Bill Moyers" discussing how she met Hillary Clinton and convinced her not to endorse the bankruptcies law changes that the credit card industry had lobbied for. Hillary spoke to Bill and got the law to not pass. *Whew* But we need people like her in Washington on a permanent basis.